Miranda Backes, PLPC

No, I would not! In my opinion, rather then working for the good of the children she is suppose to be representing, looking out for their best interests & referring to them as her clients she just refers to the court ordered person paying the bill as “her client” & lets them call the shots. When a well-respected, court appointed, counselor for the children (who Miranda is suppose to be utilizing guidance, seeking information, getting input & direction from per court documents) makes suggestions/addresses concerns Miranda's response is that she will have to check with “her client” to okay it. Per paperwork Miranda is authorized to communicate with both parties (biological parents) but she lets “her client” tell her not to communicate with the other unless he/she is also in on it (text, etc). The children don't want to go to her counseling bc whatever they bring up she sides with “her client” & takes up for him/her, even stifling the conversation if it isn't going “her client's” way.